Who Really Has the Corrupted Gospels?

6. Who Really Has the Corrupted Gospels?

Islam accuses the canonical gospels of corruption. But secular historians trace the Quran's Jesus stories to later legends like those in the 2nd century Infancy Gospel of Thomas, which they consider far less credible than the canonical gospels.

So ironically, Islam calls the more reliable gospels corrupt while drawing from the actual corruptions.

Quran

Infancy Gospel of Thomas

A pre-Quranic fragment (dated by scholars to the 4th/5th century) we have of the infancy gospel preserves this story. 4th-5th century papyrus of the Infancy Gospel of Thomas

One-Liners
  • The Burden of Proof: Corrupted compared to what? The Injeel? Where is the Injeel in the real world so we can verify the corruption claim?
  • The Double-Edged Sword: You can't use New Testament manuscripts to prove corruption while ignoring their agreement on Jesus' divinity, unless you produce an earlier Injeel that denies it.